Letter to the Editor: Wyoming Supreme Court should not punish anti-gay justices

Editor’s Note: This is a letter from a reader not affiliated with the Branding Iron and Student Media. Some may vigorously disagree with the sentiments in this letter (and even find some of it alarming), but it is not our responsibility to cut opinion out of our readership. 

So now Judge Ruth Neely has been publicly censured by a divided (3-2) Wyoming Supreme Court because she said her religious beliefs prevented her from presiding over same-sex marriages.

If the U.S. Supreme Court abused its power and ruled that blacks were inferior to whites, would the majority of the Wyoming Supreme Court just go along with that ridiculous decision?  Would it punish “civilly disobedient” justices who tried to fight it?

The bizarre decision by five wayward Supreme Court Justices to impose so-called “gay marriage” on this country, which decision basically equates immoral heterophobic homosexuals with normal moral heterosexuals and can’t be supported with science and logic and natural law, is a decision that should be opposed.   

Thinking people have known for centuries that homosexuality is an objective disorder and that homosexual activity is immoral and a bad legal precedent.  Contrary to “politically correct” propaganda, it is pretty obvious that homosexual minds in heterosexual bodies, female minds in male bodies, and male minds in female bodies are all sure signs that something went wrong somewhere (in nature and/or nurture), are all clearly mind/body mismatches or disorders (a commonsense position taken for years by the American Psychiatric Association before it became infected with ever-so-trendy “political correctness”).  

We collectively need to tell the five wayward Supreme Court Justices who abused their power and forced this nonsense on us to, essentially, “take a hike.”  This country should not only ignore their irrational decision, but demand they resign.  They are an embarrassment.

Wayne Lela (630-964-4678)